He believed killing deer was unfair, but he still let his friend pressure him into doing it. The point I was trying to make was that Vaughn was finicky. reply would never aim a gun at an innocent, majestic, beautiful, and dear (pun intended) creature such as a deer. He is probably going to wish many times in the future that he had died with his friend. Vaughan will suffer with this for the rest of his life so maybe his friend really got the easier choice. In the end it was he and his friend both dying or saving himself.
So once his friend killed the father there was little they could do. They could've pleaded self defense but it might've been a hard sell. Vaughan still wanted to do the "right thing" even after his friend had killed the father but no longer felt his say was enough since his friend had dug a deeper hole for them both and they were now beyond an accident and actually guilty of murder. Very few people would go to the drastic extent of his friend and I think it was obvious it was not likely to work out. Would they have been condemned anyway without the cover up? Maybe if his friend hadn't killed the father than Vaughan would've taken his due.But then again, would they have survived the anger of this backwoods village in the first place. But was the father really going to kill Vaughan and was his reaction necessary? Vaughan accidentally kills the boy and his friend reacts swiftly at the threat of the father. caught up in a situation spiraling rapidly out of control. I think he was basically a good man and basically representative of most of us, an every day man. I disagree with your consensus that Vaughan was a "spineless moron".
0 kommentar(er)
